" To link this statement from taxesareforever with math, physics, engineering, and medicine is a false and faulty linkage."
In what way? They are all products of rational thinking. Taxesareforever has called rational thinking the devil's work. He has said,
""I don't consider rational thinking as a gift. It might be thought of as the Devil's play book."
Here are some more of his gems(not sure how much of this thread you have followed):
"That is the reason that people who think rationally usually reject God because the thought of a God who could accomplish so much is just not rational and therefore unbelievable."
(in other words, rational thinking leads to atheism--CG)
"I do not think that I am capable of making rational decisions on my own."
"Why is it not wrong in other countries? If there laws allow it, that is what makes it right."
(speaking of things like honor killings, genital mutilation, stoning of adulterers; expressing his moral relativism--CG)
"By the way, answer my question. Is slavery a moral issue? If you say it is where do you derive what is moral and what isn't?"
"Of course I consider abortion wrong. If the our government sanctioned slavery I would say it was wrong because it would be against our Constitution."
(Whatever a government says is OK--CG)
"What is right or wrong for one country is not necessarily right or wrong for another country. Just ask the people living in other countries."
""Like I said, the Bible doesn't support it nor does it condemn it, so who am I to say it is immoral."
(speaking of slavery--CG)
"I did not say slavery was moral just because the government allows it."
(admitting he thinks slavery IS moral--CG)
Saving the best for last,
"My position on slavery? I don't consider it is wrong to have slaves."
I don't think you want to be defending this one Running Wolf. Just think of what you would be defending.
Look you have just added a bunch of clipped text from perhaps 10 or more postings that had nothing to do with what I responded to.
And now you are suggesting I am defending something.
Well okay I went back and read the thread and your clipped out pieces, and your answers to them.
I disagree with your assessment of what taxesforever is saying. I understood it, and maybe you did too, or maybe you did not.
If you and the others on your side took it all in, you might give him a break. Of course that would be no fun in the gotcha ambush game that goes on in these threads. That BTW was one of the first things I noticed that passes for intelligent debate here, but Wolf can heist a leg too if he wants.
So I'll address this slavery issue. 1st of all its absurd, not recent, not practiced, has been decided, etc etc. But if you really want to make an issue of it, the subject of slavery should be at least split from the slavery in early civilization of agrarian warrior cultures (where the Bible talks about) as opposed to the slavery as practiced of say 1400 to 1900. I am surprised none of the educated evo guys ever made that distinction.
See why I would like to take your side more seriously but I cant? Thats just one place where my sarcasm comes from that I direct your way. You evo guys want to hold yourself out as some sort of intellectual superiors, and then I see all of this.. Whats up with that??
Like our debate. I said (in a nutshell) that evo cant stand on its own and as I see it it cant. There is evidence, but not for an evo conclusion. So then your response is to insist I am a creationist (even though I said I am not), and demand proof of the resurrection (which I never brought in you did). Whats up with that?
Wolf (looking askance) And then you think you have won some sort of victory?
Wolf