I can see where this is going - a circular argument with no "correct" answer. Sorry - don't have time today. If you want to argue something concrete, let me know.
"Sorry - don't have time today. If you want to argue something concrete, let me know."
I am not asking for a "correct" answer, I am just asking for a reasonable and scientific answer. Defining intelligence in terms of other abstract notions such as "thought" or "consciousness", etc. will not produce a definition that will give rise to a valid scientific theory.