Skip to comments.
G.E. Commits to Dredging 43 Miles of Hudson River
NY Times ^
| October 7, 2005
| ANTHONY DePALMA
Posted on 10/06/2005 7:16:54 PM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
This will probably have unintended consequences and become a fiasco. I hope I'm wrong.
1
posted on
10/06/2005 7:17:00 PM PDT
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
Drudging? Does Matt know about this?
2
posted on
10/06/2005 7:21:31 PM PDT
by
msnimje
(If you suspect this post might need a sarcasm tag..... it does!)
To: neverdem
3
posted on
10/06/2005 7:22:55 PM PDT
by
GladesGuru
("In a society predicated upon liberty, it is essential to examine principles)
To: neverdem
Of course it will. The PCBs will become suspended in the water, and then the lefties will sue GE because they dredged it.
4
posted on
10/06/2005 7:25:54 PM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: neverdem
The Shadow Knows..(corrected headline)
Government Extorts G.E. Into Paying for the Destruction of 43 Miles of Clean, Pristine, Hudson River.
Self encapsulating PCB's to be released in swirling muck all the way to NYC.
5
posted on
10/06/2005 7:26:22 PM PDT
by
xcamel
(No more RINOS - Not Now, Not Ever Again.)
To: neverdem
Somebody please tell me if I am wrong. The PCB's are lying on the river bottom. Probably pretty harmless because they are sediment and just laying there. Now when they start dredging, they will stir up the bottom and silt wil be washed downstream expanding the contaminated area. Making things worse. Then just what are they going to do with the tons of silt that doesnt wash downstream? Sometimes if it aint broke , dont fix it.
To: neverdem
There are so many angles to this.
First, the government gave GE permission to dump the PCB's in the first place. What GE did was legal and permissable. After the fact, society changes and decides that it doesn't want the PCB's. Who should pay, GE, or Society?
2nd. GE has made the argument that leaving the PCB's is safer than stirring them up. I don't know if that is true or not, but the same damn environmentalist who say dredge them up won't allow dredging of New York harbor because of the environmental damage they think dredging will do
All this suggests the main motivation against GE is just a shakedown.
7
posted on
10/06/2005 8:12:27 PM PDT
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: Rodney King
"All this suggests the main motivation against GE is just a shakedown."
We have a bingo.
This looks like a really stupid move to me.
8
posted on
10/06/2005 8:21:21 PM PDT
by
dsc
To: dsc
"All this suggests the main motivation against GE is just a shakedown." A shakedown without a benefit. Typical liberal attitude -- through tons of money at a "problem whether or not it will help.
9
posted on
10/06/2005 8:25:33 PM PDT
by
You Dirty Rats
(They misunderestimated Roberts; now they are misunderestimating Miers)
To: neverdem
it's a deep pocket grab. some unions somewhere cooked this up and some politicos went with it. sickening. ought to make for some interesting marine engineering, though.
To: You Dirty Rats
" "All this suggests the main motivation against GE is just a shakedown."
A shakedown without a benefit. "
There is a major benefit from the Communism Lite perspective. America wastes the total amount of money in the settlement because the premise of the action is false.
If you are trying to handicap or destroy America - and they are - then you do it one industry or one large company at a time.
11
posted on
10/06/2005 9:09:11 PM PDT
by
GladesGuru
("In a society predicated upon liberty, it is essential to examine principles)
To: El Gato; JudyB1938; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; ..
12
posted on
10/06/2005 9:37:09 PM PDT
by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: GladesGuru
Lest we forget...the asbestos fiasco.......another attorney welfare project!
To: neverdem
Bad move, GE. You are just feeding the alligator.
14
posted on
10/06/2005 10:02:39 PM PDT
by
Mind-numbed Robot
(Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
To: Claytonbridge
From what I understand the PCB's are buried now after many years in river bed sediment. This dredging will stir the whole damned riverbed up again and put the PCB's back into suspension in the water.
This will take years and the PCB laden sludge will be dumped on land and numerous sites along the river. I'm sure local residents near this sludge dump will just love it.
This also doesn't take into consideration the possibility of high water during during a heavy snow melt or high rainfall just waiting to cause a disaster for any means of control over the situation.
If the enviros are worried about the PCBs now they haven't seen anything yet once the digging starts.
The blatant stupidity and waste of money involved in this project is mind boggling.
I can't wait to see the news stories on this undertaking as it progresses in the years to come. We'll have our very own "Big Dig" fiasco.
To: the invisib1e hand
They ought to prospect the silt for gold dust, throw the fish back, and no mercy for the crawdads.
16
posted on
10/07/2005 12:19:37 AM PDT
by
carumba
To: neverdem
I'm interested in those subjects, but I'm not about to register on the NY Slimes site.
17
posted on
10/07/2005 1:46:56 AM PDT
by
dsc
To: dsc
Who does? Register, that is.
Try getting a password from www.bugmenot.com.
At one paper, the password:
bugmenotjunk@hotmail.com worked, followed by the user: ID bugmenotjunk.
Using it means they can follow basic orders, like "BUG ME NOT!!!
:-)
18
posted on
10/07/2005 4:25:41 AM PDT
by
GladesGuru
("In a society predicated upon liberty, it is essential to examine principles)
To: neverdem
Do PCB's have a chemical life? If so ,it should be deteriorating after these years. Maybe it would be better to just let it lay and dissolve into a harmless chemical.
19
posted on
10/07/2005 5:11:39 AM PDT
by
G-Man 1
To: neverdem
LEAVE EM ALONE!!!
PCB's end up burried by new sedement and are best left be.
Dredging is just going to put them back into the water.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson