Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SpringheelJack

I'm not sure. But I'm thinking there are two explanations. One is that she is a dottering old woman, in which case that will be clear in the hearings and she will be gone.

The other is that, having spent the last years of her life vetting candidates and preparing them for questioning by the senate, she has a keen sense of what to say to the democrats when they ask her questions. And the "correct" answer to this question for her was really Warren Burger.

I'd love to hear her explain WHY that was her answer. And maybe her explanation would scare me.


350 posted on 10/06/2005 10:48:23 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT
The other is that, having spent the last years of her life vetting candidates and preparing them for questioning by the senate, she has a keen sense of what to say to the democrats when they ask her questions. And the "correct" answer to this question for her was really Warren Burger.

Considering the gnashing of teeth her nomination has caused on the right (the left has been keeping its lips shut mostly) it had to be the height of foolishness for her to suggest, to anyone, someone like Warren Burger as her favorite justice. If she was worried about offending Democrats, she could have picked Rehnquist, who lacks the scare value of Scalia and Thomas, and is also still enjoying the glow of approval that always follows someone's death.

Honest or dishonest, it doesn't speak well for her.

359 posted on 10/06/2005 10:56:35 PM PDT by SpringheelJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson