[ontos-on]

Your theory that it is W's pick might be true if this were the British Empire, but it isn't. Maybe that's the problem: W does think he is the sole owner of his presidency. We had a part too. And his promises to us matter a whole lot. This is beginning to look inexcusable. I was willing to go along with him, but I am beginning to hear that this woman is just another "go along Sally, who does not do things independently or enagage in "even interesting conversation".

I always said that I knew people like th eClintons in Law School and that secured me in my distaste for them and a fairly accurate gauge. I am beginning to think that of Miers as well. Miss Neat Hard Worker, puddle deep intellectually. I am afraid that W does not have the capacities to know what is required in a Judge other than a slogan about "not making the law." Things are a little more complex than that and we need someone who is intellectually agile enough not to get caught up by the "appealing" aspects of leftist judicial thought.

[RTINSC]

"I always said that I knew people like th Clintons in Law School"

Are you an attorney?

[HelloooClareece]

Puddle deep intellectually? Why don't you wait until after the hearings before you judge her intellect? I thought that in this country we were all innocent until proven guilty. If you didn't learn that in law 101 perhaps you are not the one to be judging Ms. Miers and her qualifications.