[quidnunc]

Treader wrote: quidnunc wrote- "After many years of working together, W knows that Miers agrees with him on nearly everthing." In your reference of Miers record- there is not one mention of Meirs Border/Port security "ideas," so, (by your referenced post) I can just assume her placid agreement to President GW Bush's current proactive illegal immigrant policies. Play dumb again, quidnunc...

Ypou're making no sense at all.

What does SCOTUS have to do with immigration and border security?

[Treader]

You don't think that border security issues will reach SCOTUS, in the next year or that as a White House counsel, she has never discussed this issue with POTUS? Outstanding! Thank you for your time.

[blake6900]

What does SCOTUS have to do with immigration and border security?

That's the point...these guys are the first to b!tch about judges legislating from the bench but it appears they don't find that problematic as long as the end result is acceptable to them. They don't want 'strict constructionists', they want yes-men to the conservative cause. Sadly, they're more in agreement conceptually with liberals than they'd care to--or are able to--acknowledge.

I for one don't have a problem "trusting Bush". Hell, that's why I voted for him. Imagine that. Too bad they can't. Perhaps this behavior explains the "reactionary conservative" stereotype we live with.