Why is it that no one seems to be concerned-even the slightest bit-that this woman has spent sixty years of her life not accumulating a written or oral record by which you could discern her political or judicial philosophy?
I have friends in their twenties whose political viewpoints are immediately identifiable.
Doesn't this disturb any of the Miers supporters, just the least bit?
Doesn't it raise some qualms about her nomination?
I should take his opinion seriously?
Because as Roberts so eloquently stated, SC justices are not politicians!
No, it doesn't. Why? Because the *purpose* of this nomination is to not give liberals ammunition with which to defeat it.