Skip to comments.
Flashback: George Will Against Nuclear Option
Washington Post ^
| 3/20/2005
| George Will
Posted on 10/06/2005 2:30:31 PM PDT by Mighty_Quinn
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 last
To: Alberta's Child
Well, it really could be much ado about nada. I think the most compelling argument FOR her is that Clarence Thomas, who is arguably the best on the Court, also had an unimpressive resume and was looked at as a diversity pick.
As brilliant as Scalia is, he's notably more big gubmint than Thomas. Scalia's commerce clause jurisprudence, for example, is quite liberal. So who knows? If she turned out to be another Thomas, that'd be a very good deal.
41
posted on
10/07/2005 7:13:17 AM PDT
by
Huck
("I'm calling a moratorium on Miers/Bush/GOP bashing--but it won't be easy (thanks tex))
To: Alberta's Child
Your reply makes no sense
He ran on a campaign promise to the American people
He ought to keep his commitment
42
posted on
10/07/2005 9:17:36 AM PDT
by
uncbob
To: uncbob
He also ran on a promise not to use the U.S. military for stupid, futile nation-building campaigns.
Guess we all have something to be disappointed about.
43
posted on
10/07/2005 9:46:47 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
(I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
To: Alberta's Child
I doubt many would characterize the WOT as you do
I guess you think you thwart terrorism by sitting and waiting
44
posted on
10/07/2005 10:52:52 AM PDT
by
uncbob
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson