Oh. So the logic is that one can often be wrong about the Constitution and yet be qualified to interpret it, yet one cannot be assumed to be qualified if one does not have a degree from an Ivy League university. Is that it?
I have no idea what an IV league degree has to do with anything and I certainly do not feel it is necessary to be on the SCOTUS. There are many factors that qualify people to sit on the Supreme Court and educational excellence is only one of them.