Skip to comments.
Democrats blast Bush speech on Iraq
AP ^
| October 6 2005
Posted on 10/06/2005 12:20:04 PM PDT by jmc1969
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
1
posted on
10/06/2005 12:20:05 PM PDT
by
jmc1969
To: jmc1969
"Democrats blast Bush speech" is not news. It's like announcing that the sun set again last night.
2
posted on
10/06/2005 12:22:15 PM PDT
by
caisson71
To: jmc1969
Fleas in the kingdom.
They will be mocked and scorned throught history as the traitiors and enemy comforters that they are.
If they are remembered at all.
3
posted on
10/06/2005 12:23:42 PM PDT
by
Skooz
("Political Correctness is the handmaiden of terrorism" - Michelle Malkin)
To: jmc1969
Geee...it sounds like these comments were written before he actually gave the speech, ya think??
4
posted on
10/06/2005 12:24:01 PM PDT
by
Wiseghy
(Discontent is the want of self-reliance: it is infirmity of will. – Ralph Waldo Emerson)
To: jmc1969
Durbin upset because Bush can't predict the future.
To: Wiseghy
Geee...it sounds like these comments were written before he actually gave the speech, ya think??Yea about 4 1/2 years ago. LOL.
6
posted on
10/06/2005 12:29:35 PM PDT
by
Mister Baredog
(("It dawned on me that I was present at the birth of a political jihad."))
To: All
Nancy Pelosi's remarks had to be prepared beforehand - this pekinese eyed b*tch's response sounded as if she never even heard what Bush said - despicable dried up old political whore
To: jmc1969
Bin Laden was right...Democrats do not have the stomach to win a war.
8
posted on
10/06/2005 12:36:47 PM PDT
by
Rudder
To: caisson71
If they win a election maybe they can set policy and not just offer assinine statements
9
posted on
10/06/2005 12:38:02 PM PDT
by
italianquaker
(Bush Derangement syndome coming to a theatre near you)
To: jmc1969
The Demrats don't mind talking 'stupid' - knowing perhaps their constituency does not recognize otherwise; but it does allow them to write their criticisms/rebuttal before Bush speaks. . .
Perhaps they want President Bush to do a 'Geraldo'. . .draw lines on the WH lawn. . .
Just wonder what part of 'protracted war' they do not understand.
10
posted on
10/06/2005 12:40:17 PM PDT
by
cricket
(No Freedom - No Peace)
To: jmc1969
"Richard Durbin of Illinois says the president failed to answer the question most Americans are asking: When will there be enough Iraqi battalions ready to fight so U-S troops can begin coming home?"
Heck, I can answer that. The Iraqi troops will be ready August 4, 2006. Unless there is a delay.
11
posted on
10/06/2005 12:40:51 PM PDT
by
joebuck
To: jmc1969
Shouldn't this story be relegated to page B12 or something?
12
posted on
10/06/2005 12:41:50 PM PDT
by
Fido969
("And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free" (John 8:32).)
To: jmc1969
13
posted on
10/06/2005 12:42:09 PM PDT
by
Califelephant
(Liberals: "We've always been soft on criminals, but now we're soft on terrorists too.")
To: CharlesWayneCT
AJ Durbin wouldn't know a plan if he tripped over it.
He's the type who would spill the beans if his mothers life depended on it remaining secret. He is nothing more than a Taliban-Al Quida operative. His recent tearful apology showed more about the man,than the politician. Pitiful!!
Doogle
14
posted on
10/06/2005 12:43:26 PM PDT
by
Doogle
(8th AF...4077thTFW....408thMMS....Ubon Thailand "69"..Night Line Delivery ..AMMO)
To: caisson71
Whatever. The important thing is what happens in the referendum on the Iraqi Constitution. If Our Federal Constitution had had a similar ratification process, it would never have been approved.
15
posted on
10/06/2005 12:46:10 PM PDT
by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
To: jmc1969
One of the Democrat's most pressing problems, and, I think, a major reason for their decline, is that it is hard for voters to avoid the conclusion that Democrats care nothing about America or the average American. In fact, they seem to hate America.
Democrats' only interest seems to be in regaining power whatever it takes. I would not be at all surprised if the Democrats mounted a military coup on the White House.
In recent decades the once great Democrat party has hemorrhaged voters, lost election after election on all state and national political levels, and can get money only from special interest groups, fat-cat socialist billionaires and foreign donors.
Am I wrong? Anyone?
To: jmc1969
"Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid says the president failed to detail a strategy for the military..."
Seems Harry wants the U.S. to tell our enemies what we plan on doing.
17
posted on
10/06/2005 12:47:54 PM PDT
by
PLM
To: jmc1969
Harry Reid is a real sick jerk. If he had listened he would have heard a strategy. It just he is hard of hearing and the connection from his ear to brain is fogged with pasture patties.
18
posted on
10/06/2005 12:48:45 PM PDT
by
Logical me
(Oh, well!!!)
To: italianquaker
"If they win a election maybe they can set policy and not just offer assinine statements"
These people suffer from a self-induced, egocentric and fixed myopia and 'assinine' is where they begin and end. . .
19
posted on
10/06/2005 12:49:00 PM PDT
by
cricket
(No Freedom - No Peace)
To: italianquaker
Goomba...... usually you need a polocy to win with.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson