To: West Coast Conservative
I'm worried this was always as it appeared to be and we've been reading between the lines. The last event was Miller naming Scooter. Suddenly there seems the possibility of a Scooter v. Rove scenario. That would seem the worst case scenario if they've been nailed for fudging the facts. Obviously no crime was committed re Plame but it's usually the aftermath that gets you. I'll hope for the best but fear the worst. I'll happily settle for an indictment with a he said she said Rove v. Miller type of thing.
To: easymoney
I think you may be right. If Miller agreed to only testify about Libby, why would Rove be going back in now?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson