Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Perdogg

He's gotta explain discrepancies between his testimony and the reporters' testimony. If the Grand Jury doesn't buy it, and they usually are pretty persnickity, then he'll be indicted.


36 posted on 10/06/2005 12:46:47 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Brilliant

Indicted for what Perjury? Very hard to prove.


40 posted on 10/06/2005 12:48:29 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: Brilliant
I have nothing by rumor to go on, but from the expressions on people's faces around these parts...they're really worried.

Damn, I'm getting a headache--big time.
44 posted on 10/06/2005 12:49:53 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: Brilliant
He's gotta explain discrepancies between his testimony and the reporters' testimony. If the Grand Jury doesn't buy it, and they usually are pretty persnickity, then he'll be indicted.

Except Rove offered to provide further testimony back in July and Fitzgerald wanted Miller on the record first. Obviously it is not the Rove camp behind this highly spun leak.

134 posted on 10/06/2005 1:35:37 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson