To: Perdogg
He's gotta explain discrepancies between his testimony and the reporters' testimony. If the Grand Jury doesn't buy it, and they usually are pretty persnickity, then he'll be indicted.
To: Brilliant
Indicted for what Perjury? Very hard to prove.
40 posted on
10/06/2005 12:48:29 PM PDT by
Perdogg
To: Brilliant
I have nothing by rumor to go on, but from the expressions on people's faces around these parts...they're really worried.
Damn, I'm getting a headache--big time.
To: Brilliant
He's gotta explain discrepancies between his testimony and the reporters' testimony. If the Grand Jury doesn't buy it, and they usually are pretty persnickity, then he'll be indicted.Except Rove offered to provide further testimony back in July and Fitzgerald wanted Miller on the record first. Obviously it is not the Rove camp behind this highly spun leak.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson