Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wcdukenfield
And it's possible the president didn't want to limp into this fight. That's no excuse. But McCain — who wants to be president and has now endorsed Harriet Miers

I can't understand, if Levin believes this of McCain and the gang, what he wanted Bush to do. What would it serve to have the type of nominee he had hoped for demeaned and debased by the Democrats followed by a display of Republicans who wouldn't trigger the "nuclear option?"

As for McCain...I made up my mind long ago that I would never vote for him.

5 posted on 10/06/2005 11:34:56 AM PDT by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dolphy

Hear, hear.

Nice to hear a rational argument.


10 posted on 10/06/2005 11:40:56 AM PDT by Iris7 ("Let me go to the house of the Father.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dolphy

As for McCain...I made up my mind long ago that I would never vote for him.




me either, he might list himself as repub, but he is nothing more than an agent for the left


15 posted on 10/06/2005 11:50:52 AM PDT by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dolphy

I believe, as I think Mark does, that it is high time that Bush and staunch Republicans put their mark in the sand. They need to take a stand, which up to now they have not and have let the demorats run the show. It's high time that the Republicans fight back in the interests of conservativism. If they don't, what is the sense in having two parties.


17 posted on 10/06/2005 11:54:16 AM PDT by taxesareforever (Government is running amuck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dolphy
" What would it serve to have the type of nominee he had hoped for demeaned and debased by the Democrats followed by a display of Republicans who wouldn't trigger the "nuclear option?"

Party politics aside, what it would have done is brought the entire left / right debate into sharp public focus. There come times when one must stand on principal. If not now, when?

And in political terms, there are a number of dem senators in red states up for re-election next cycle who may have been vulnerable had the pres dedicated sufficient political capital to the issue.
24 posted on 10/06/2005 12:04:33 PM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dolphy
I can't understand, if Levin believes this of McCain and the gang, what he wanted Bush to do.

If Bush Jr. doesn't have the guts to take on the likes of Schmucky Schumer, Kennedy and Feinswine now, then when, exactly?

Are buttwipes like them going to remain unchallenged and unrefuted until the day they die in their chairs?

Or is Bush Jr. waiting for something important to challenge them?

27 posted on 10/06/2005 12:07:27 PM PDT by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dolphy
Amen and Amen. I have absolutely no use for McCain. There is no way I can vote for him, but if Hilly is the opposition I am going to be in a real pickle. I really don't like McCain but I really, really despise Hilly. Amen.
38 posted on 10/06/2005 12:30:50 PM PDT by gakrak ("A wise man's heart is his right hand, But a fool's heart is at his left" Eccl 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson