Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tailgunner Joe

The true believers still insist that if Lenin had lived longer and prevented Stalin from coming to power then the USSR would have turned out differently. That doesn't change the fact that he was the chief architect of the concept of One Party Rule.


2 posted on 10/06/2005 9:25:27 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Borges

The "true believers" are wrong. "Lenin was different" is a myth. Lenin was every bit as ruthless and bloodthirsty as Stalin. It's all in Simon Montefiore's marvelous, definitive biography, "Stalin: The Court of the Red Tsar."


11 posted on 10/06/2005 9:35:52 AM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Borges

His NEP (New Economic Policy) was kind of Gorbachev Perestroika and did offer some relief to the people after the atrocities of the Civil War.


59 posted on 10/06/2005 11:25:31 AM PDT by Mi-kha-el ((There is no Pravda in Izvestiya and no Izvestiya in Pravda.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Borges
That doesn't change the fact that he was the chief architect of the concept of One Party Rule.

And thus totalitarianism, not just for his country but the entire world.

118 posted on 10/07/2005 10:15:41 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson