[Ol' Sparky]

With over 3,000 unbelievers dying every hour, I wonder how many could have been saved while Christians were worrying about the selection of Harriet Miers after it was cast in stone?

About one million unborn children are dying each year. If that is ever going to be diminished, it's vital to have justices that are willing to overturn Roe. Yet, we have no idea how Miers or Roberts would rule on Roe.

[KMAJ2]

[[About one million unborn children are dying each year. If that is ever going to be diminished, it's vital to have justices that are willing to overturn Roe. Yet, we have no idea how Miers or Roberts would rule on Roe.]]

I find this to be a little bit of a double standard, we say the left has no right to ask the question of whether they will uphold Roe v Wade, yet you argue for the right to know they will overturn it ? As an argument for or against Miers or Roberts, that type of reasoning is pure illogic.

Every case brought before the Supreme Court should be decided by the arguments made, precedents sited and facts presented in each individual case, to do otherwise is judicial activism.