Huh? This is the most convoluted, irrational piece I've read. Here we have a strong, Christian woman who is, by all evidence, STRONGLY pro-life and anti-sodomy, and some Christian groups should have opposed her? Huh???
I know a lot of Christians that are "STRONGLY pro-life and anti-sodomy", but that doesn't qualify them to sit on the highest court of the land. Can she write an excellent judicial opinion that will sway other SC judges who haven't made up their minds? Can she write an opinion that will withstand future cases?