Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck
The fact that he has to backtrack and clarify proves the point that he did in fact gush over her.

And he's a liar. And he did a 180 on Roberts.

So what is your point here?

11 posted on 10/06/2005 7:46:34 AM PDT by dirtboy (Drool overflowed my buffer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy

My point is it's absurd for you to use a liar's words today as proof that he was lying yesterday. In fact, there's no contradiction. He's tempering what was intially gushing enthusiasm. He probably got feedback to tone it down. Point being, today could be the lie, not his initial reaction, and you have no way of knowing.


12 posted on 10/06/2005 7:54:12 AM PDT by Huck ("Sometimes you're better off not knowing how much you've been had." --Bob Dylan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson