Yes you already said you believe Civil War and Holocaust happened. I was not referring to that, but the analogy referenced. It was the linkage you and these others with these analogies make to evolution that is a great overreach.
Now my analogy (and maybe you think it is goofy) is about events. The evidence for events like the H-Bomb events (for argument sake take out the ground bursts), or even physical phenomena can be very ephemeral, gone in a hundred years. I could present something that seemed evidence to me of that event and you might reject it.
The evidence we have in the physical world, perhaps you see evolution, I see evidence of something much more wonderful.
You have not presented one shred of positive physical proof the Resurrection happened. I am still waiting.
Like I said about your demand for evidence of this event. One minute you said it is a moot point (to Diamond) because you have not received anything, the next minute you refuse to define what that something might be for you.
So there is a dichotomy in evidence, and what CarolinaGuitarman accepts as evidence for this event. If somehow I brought an image burned in stone you would insist an enterprising roman learned how to chemical etch or such ;)
So the issue of whether RunningWolf has positive physical proof that the Resurrection happened (that CarolinaGuitarman accepts) is contained within the threads this forum.
Wolf
"Yes you already said you believe Civil War and Holocaust happened. I was not referring to that, but the analogy referenced. "
No, you said I didn't know if it happened. Stop running from what you said.
"Like I said about your demand for evidence of this event. One minute you said it is a moot point (to Diamond) because you have not received anything,..."
It was a moot point only because nobody had even attempted to provide any physical evidence. The kind of evidence I would accept doesn't matter when no evidence at all is given.
"If somehow I brought an image burned in stone you would insist an enterprising roman learned how to chemical etch or such ;)"
There is no such image though. And an image would be evidence of what? Certainly not the Resurrection.
"So the issue of whether RunningWolf has positive physical proof that the Resurrection happened (that CarolinaGuitarman accepts) is contained within the threads this forum."
I didn't ask for proof (not a very subtle distortion of what I said, BTW. I have already stated that logical proof is only for mathematical theorems)), I asked for any physical evidence. So we see, the answer is no, Running Wolf has no physical evidence whatsoever. Or else he would have provided said evidence.