[r9etb]

Not a creationist? Right, we believe that(note I never said YEC). You can't stand science, yet you know nothing about how works. You demand absolute proof from evolutionists but you get insulted when someone asks for just one bit of physical evidence to back up your claims. The height of arrogant hypocrisy.

Looking back on the thread, it seems that you're calling Running Wolf a liar and hypocrite, apparently for no reason other than because he committed the heinous crime of questioning your statements. Perhaps you should hold off on your accusations of "arrogant hypocrisy," Mr. Pot.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Perhaps you should hold off on your accusations of "arrogant hypocrisy,..."

Not if it's true I won't, Mr. Kettle.

"Looking back on the thread, it seems that you're calling Running Wolf a liar and hypocrite, apparently for no reason other than because he committed the heinous crime of questioning your statements."

Maybe it's because he IS an arrogant hypocrite? :)
He IS a creationist, whether it be YEC or OEC or ID; it's all variations on the same theme.


I am still waiting for positive physical evidence of the Resurrection. Why is that so hard to give? Isn't it already proved? Why do YOUR beliefs get a pass and science has to provide absolute proof? Why can't you just say that the Resurrection is based on Faith? I'll accept that, and I'll respect the honesty.