The elitism charge is well founded because the original complaint they went charging off with was that she wasn't good enough to be on the Supreme Court. Pure worship of the man behind the curtain.
Didn't the Peanut Farmer profess to be a conservative evangelical Christian?
Seriously, while being a conservative evangelical Christian is a strong indicator in her favor, donating to the Democratic National Committee in 1988 is a strong one against her. A complete lack of writings on Constitutional law or judicial philosophy leaves the two main qualifications a complete blank slate. The rest of what little is known about her leaves a confused set of indicators.
Is it wrong to ask for something solid? Is it wrong, not a week after Chief Justice Roberts was confirmed 78-22, to have had a nominee without a thin, confused record?