Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYT: Pentagon Analyst Admits Sharing Secret Data (Lawrence A. Franklin)
New York Times ^ | October 6, 2005 | ERIC LICHTBLAU

Posted on 10/06/2005 5:52:41 AM PDT by OESY

A senior Defense Department analyst admitted Wednesday that he shared secret military information with two pro-Israeli lobbyists and an Israeli official in an effort to create a "backchannel" to the Bush administration on Middle East policy.

The analyst, Lawrence A. Franklin, pleaded guilty in federal court here to three criminal counts for improperly retaining and disclosing classified information, and he gave the first account of his motives and thinking in establishing secret liaisons with people outside the government.

The offenses carry a maximum of 25 years in prison, but as part of a plea agreement, prosecutors are expected to recommend leniency for Mr. Franklin in return for his cooperation in a continuing investigation in the January trial of the two lobbyists, Steven J. Rosen and Keith Weissman.

The lobbyists were dismissed last year by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or Aipac, after the investigation became public.

Mr. Franklin, 58, said in entering his guilty pleas that he had shared with the lobbyists "my frustrations with a particular policy" during repeated meetings from 2002 to 2004. He did not divulge the particular policy, but officials in the case said he was referring to the Bush administration's dealings with Iran.

Some of the more hawkish officials in the administration have pushed for a harder line in confronting Iran about its nuclear ambitions....

Mr. Franklin worked for a time as a senior analyst on Iran under Douglas Feith, a former under secretary at the Pentagon. Mr. Franklin said in court that he believed the Aipac lobbyists had access and influence at the National Security Council, which coordinates policy issues for the president and was deeply involved in setting the administration's course on Iran.

He said he hoped the lobbyists could help influence policy by passing on information that he knew was classified....

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aipac; dod; espionage; feith; iran; keithweissman; larryfranklin; lawrencefranklin; nationalsecurity; nsa; nuclear; pentagon; spy; stevenrosen

1 posted on 10/06/2005 5:52:45 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OESY
Why are they dealing with this guy? He was a spy, for crying out loud! He's the actor in this case. He's the one who had the information entrusted to him by our government.
Bury the bastard.
2 posted on 10/06/2005 6:00:38 AM PDT by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegreatbeast

The Bush justice dept. is, and has been, soft of crime. They are limpwristed bastards. Every friggen' time they have someone by the balls, they plead it down, or flat out refuse to prosecute. They are stuck on stupid, and then some.


3 posted on 10/06/2005 6:07:51 AM PDT by Ron in Acreage (It's the borders stupid! "ALLEN IN 08")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OESY

They should do to him what they did to Joe Pesci in Goodfellas - make him think everything's okay and then shoot him in the back of the head.


4 posted on 10/06/2005 6:27:05 AM PDT by steel_resolve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

..................

5 posted on 10/06/2005 6:38:05 AM PDT by SJackson (Palestinian police…in Gaza City…firing in the air to protest a lack of bullets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thegreatbeast
Why are they dealing with this guy? He was a spy, for crying out loud! He's the actor in this case. He's the one who had the information entrusted to him by our government. Bury the bastard.

Because this is the culmination of a five year investigation/sting operation which essentially turned up nothing but Franklin. The most interesting facet of the case will be the precedent set if Rosen, a non-government employee, is convicted of listening to classified information.

6 posted on 10/06/2005 6:44:07 AM PDT by SJackson (Palestinian police…in Gaza City…firing in the air to protest a lack of bullets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thegreatbeast

It seems to me that they should be offering a plea to the lobbyists in order to nail this b**tard.


7 posted on 10/06/2005 7:28:35 AM PDT by Inwoodian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OESY

I am guessing that he is a Democrat(?)


8 posted on 10/06/2005 7:39:33 AM PDT by cricket (No Freedom. . .No Peace. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cricket

This might also have something to do with AIPAC, it which case it's amazing its even being reported on.


9 posted on 10/06/2005 11:48:37 AM PDT by skeptical_con
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OESY
Mr. Franklin said he assumed that such "tidbits" were already known to Israel, and he said that the Israeli official "gave me far more information than I gave him."

An agent of the US Government was compromising private individuals- and Israel- in a roundabout way to influence American policy.

An agent of the US was getting information FROM Israel.

And this is the guy getting the deal?

Something stinks here.

10 posted on 10/06/2005 11:57:10 AM PDT by Sabramerican (Islam is to Peace as Rape is to Love)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron in Acreage
This was really minor stuff ~ it got 12 years on a plea bargain that involves the perpetrator bringing down others.

Now, let's move on to the New York Times and it's spying on NSA's classified programs ~ does anyone think any of those jokers imagined that you'd get 12 years?

Proportionately, the NSA thing is much more serious and is probably worth a death sentence. NYT should start selecting executives and owners who will "take the punishment" on behalf of the company.

11 posted on 01/20/2006 9:38:18 AM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cricket
Are you serious?

I think you need to read up a bit on Mr. Franklin.

12 posted on 01/20/2006 9:40:49 AM PST by lugsoul ("Try not to be sad." - Laura Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson