To: CarolinaGuitarman
You don't seem to have any problems putting words in my mouth do you? Your tortured definition of the word "prove" means that nothing can be proved and that science is therefore always "wrong" to some extent. You also have continuously obfuscated about the nature of evolution science to suggest that it is equivalent to the most repeatable lab-proven theories we have. (This mischaracterization has been also criticized by moderate scientists.)
You obviously have some serious ax to grind to caricature everyone who does not share your atheism and science-worship as ignorant, superstitious, and even enablers of genocide. Since further debate is pointless, this will be my final post on this thread.
94 posted on
10/07/2005 8:12:39 AM PDT by
Ford4000
To: Ford4000
"You don't seem to have any problems putting words in my mouth do you?"
Another of your lies.
"Your tortured definition of the word "prove" means that nothing can be proved and that science is therefore always "wrong" to some extent."
No, it means our knowledge is incomplete. Scientists, unlike some people, are not so arrogant to believe they know everything.
BTW, that's not my definition of *proof*; it's reality. The only things that deal with proof are mathematical theorems and whiskey. Science can't deal with proof; it can however falsify something.
"You also have continuously obfuscated about the nature of evolution science to suggest that it is equivalent to the most repeatable lab-proven theories we have."
It is. Though you are incorrect as none of those other theories has been proved.
"You obviously have some serious ax to grind to caricature everyone who does not share your atheism and science-worship as ignorant, superstitious, and even enablers of genocide."
More lies on your part. I never ONCE said that anti-evolutionism enabled genocide. That would be your tact when you said that evolution was the cause of communism and the holocaust. That was a truly disgusting and ignorant ad hominem attack.
My statement that Hitler was a creationist was not an indictment of creationism as a source of fascism; I was clearing up your slander of evolutionists. He WAS a creationist though; he also perverted the Christian religion to be something it by nature isn't. Christianity isn't the problem, it was Hitler.
" Since further debate is pointless, this will be my final post on this thread."
As I said, you have run out of arguments. I'd run away too if I had made the points you did.
96 posted on
10/07/2005 9:27:12 AM PDT by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson