> To humanists, any suggestion of uncertainty in any element of evolution is unforgivable.
This is, of course, patently absurd. Take a look at the current state of evolutionary science; it's constantly in flux as new information comes in. This is as it should be in a *real* science.
You just don't get it.
What happened can never be determined with any accuracy so it is all a waste of time (something universities do very well). Yet humanists cannot admit that science cannot provide answers to everything. They can never admit, for example, that any cause of evolutionary change is unknown or unknowable. A *real* scientist would not have this problem.