Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KMAJ2
My post was in response to AmericaUnited, who said:

It's nice to see someone using more than two brain cells and giving in to infantile temper tantrum instincts when dealing with this nomination.

It was an attempt at gentle ribbing of his/her sentence, which probably meant to say something like, "It's nice to see someone using more than two brain cells rather than giving in to infantile temper tantrum instincts when dealing with this nomination."

FWIW, I agree with what you say. Harriet's nomination is OK with me, if only because I like to see all the pundits trip on themselves over their predictions on whom Bush would nominate. Pundit-tripping is always fun.

I might change my mind, though, based on her performance in the hearings. I think that is supposed to be the purpose of holding hearings.

I am very sorry that my posts don't have sufficient intellectual content for you.

29 posted on 10/06/2005 3:55:33 AM PDT by Restorer (Illegitimati non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Restorer

Restorer, please accept my apology.


34 posted on 10/06/2005 4:04:38 AM PDT by KMAJ2 (Freedom not defended is freedom relinquished, liberty not fought for is liberty lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson