Where are you getting that information?
If you want a Google GMail account, FReepmail me.
They're going fast!
Posted on 10/06/2005 3:13:10 AM PDT by KMAJ2
Says you.
What a great post! It's nice to see someone using more than two brain cells and giving in to infantile temper tantrum instincts when dealing with this nomination.
Great post? It's a phoney news article written by someone subscribed to the FR.
Does "KMAJ" think we're that stupid?
So he used three brain cells to produce his infantile temper tantrum?
So you have no problem with gay marriage becoming the law of the land, Christ taken out of Christmas and God removed from the pledge?
Good point......My biggest fear is that if a fignt were to take place in the Senate and the republicans will, without a doubt, cave in again. In this case, I trust GWB selection over the concerns of others. He has a history of standing by conservative judges. On the other hand Republican senators have a history of whining and caving in to the RATs.
People do that occasionally -- it's allowed as long as it's a well-thought out argument (regardless of who agrees). If you have a problem with the argument, why don't you contribute a reasoned disagreement? If you have a prejudice against reading vanities, don't read them.
"My biggest fear is that if a fignt were to take place in the Senate and the republicans will, without a doubt, cave in again."
If that's the reality with this line-up of GOP senators, then we need them to cave. On record.
How else can conservative republicans begin the process of overthrowing incumbant GOP senators? There needs to be a tangible rallying issue.
Bush, by giving cover to the Specters, Warners and Grahams out there, works *against* changing the status quo, and becomes part of the problem himself.
It is strategically brilliant. As far as the 'angry, raging conservative street (think arab street :)), they will be quite happy after seeing the first several votes. Of course, some are just miserable malcontented whiners who live to complain. For them, no person living would do.
The problem wasn't that it was an opinion from a Freeper, but that fact that it was a ruse designed to look like an indepentent media article that caused my incredulity.
The article was an attempt to by-pass the very well-thought out type of argument you advocate, as if to silence principled critics of this SCOTUS nomination.
Where are you getting that information?
If you want a Google GMail account, FReepmail me.
They're going fast!
You talk just like a lib.
RINO.
Moderator, do you think you might add "Vanity" to the title? Of course, anyone who clicks on it sees that immediately . . .
You amuse me...........now go away.
I must say I liked those two descriptive sentences.
Finally something has become so all encompassing as to lay Microsoft, Wal-Mart, and Schiavo to waste.
[[Great post? It's a phoney news article written by someone subscribed to the FR.
Does "KMAJ" think we're that stupid?]]
Phony news article ? I do not believe I checked the extended news, front page or breakings news boxes. I clearly checked vanity for a personal opinion piece. What I find amusing is the lack of any reasoned response. Ad hominem and non sequiturs anyone ? FYI, my degree is in journalism.
Then why disrupt the class by raising your hand and bothering the teacher?
Journalism????? And you're proud of that???? You are a sicko!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.