Skip to comments.
US officials brace for decisions in CIA leak case
Reuters ^
| Wed Oct 5, 9:07 PM ET
| WASHINGTON (Reuters)
Posted on 10/05/2005 9:20:51 PM PDT by Prost1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: Doc P
Hrm, that looks like disagreement ...
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator Comment #16 Removed by Moderator
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
Hah! Let that be a lesson to you, "Doc P"!
21
posted on
10/14/2005 3:09:08 PM PDT
by
rummyelendil
(Bush is awesome. God Bless America. Er ... die lieberal scum?)
Comment #22 Removed by Moderator
To: Prost1
I can't recall ever seeing so many leaks from a "secret" Grand Jury hearing.
Why don't they just make them open to the public, so we can hear the truth, instead of the constant BS from the lame stream media.
23
posted on
10/19/2005 2:27:10 PM PDT
by
airborne
(Al-Queda can recruit on college campuses but the US military can't!)
To: Fenris6
Holy smokes! It's a troll infestation! You guys must have hit a nerve!
24
posted on
10/19/2005 2:35:15 PM PDT
by
airborne
(Al-Queda can recruit on college campuses but the US military can't!)
To: Prost1
Odd how EVERY single article that was ever written
about Special Prosecutor investigations of the Clinton
mafia, kept a running tally of how much, right down
to the penny, the investigation was costing the "Merican People"...........
oh, that's right............they were democrats.
All of this is making me angry all over again at how the
Clinton's were let off the hook.
25
posted on
10/19/2005 2:36:15 PM PDT
by
MamaLucci
(Mutually assured destruction STILL keeps the Clinton administration criminals out of jail.)
To: woofie
Al Gore indicted for impersonating a humanLOL!!
26
posted on
10/19/2005 2:39:42 PM PDT
by
cardinal4
(Is it Walker Elementary? No, it is Freepers arguing over the Miers nomination!)
To: woofie
Al Gore indicted for impersonating a humanLOL!!
27
posted on
10/19/2005 2:43:51 PM PDT
by
cardinal4
(Is it Walker Elementary? No, it is Freepers arguing over the Miers nomination!)
To: Fenris6
Why would you be skeptical? Miller, in her own article, wrote that she testified that Libby was not her source for the leak of the name, that she thought the name came from another source.
28
posted on
10/19/2005 2:46:29 PM PDT
by
Eva
To: airborne
Yup. I lurked his blog for a bit - mostly demonization of people & issues they don't understand. Almost as ridiculous as DU. But hey, its a free country - the longer the Left is Stuck on Stupid, the easier my job in 06 & 08. :)
29
posted on
10/19/2005 5:38:05 PM PDT
by
Fenris6
(3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
To: Eva
"Why would you be skeptical"
I'm only skeptical b/c this prosecuter is one of the best, and is very viligant re leaks. Most the info we're seeing in the papers & on the net is suspect.
30
posted on
10/19/2005 5:39:55 PM PDT
by
Fenris6
(3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson