Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FairOpinion
[In its statement on the veto threat, the White House said the measure would "restrict the president's authority to protect Americans effectively from terrorist attack and bringing terrorists to justice."]

Well roger that! Looks like congress has finally passed the first bill that GW will veto.

67 posted on 10/05/2005 9:12:09 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (De gustibus non est disputandum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

If it does anywhere near this well in the House then it's override city.


69 posted on 10/05/2005 9:13:13 PM PDT by The Red Zone (Florida, the sun-shame state, and Illinois the chicken injun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

The thing is, even if Bush does veto it (and I'm not convinced that he will, but time will tell). There are still way too many Yea votes for this to be able to override the veto. In this type of situation, seriously, what can we really do? Outside of speaking at the ballot box, of course.


70 posted on 10/05/2005 9:15:06 PM PDT by Rock_n_Roll_Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson