To: Perdogg
I think you are right. It's seems like Fitz felt that Libby was letting Miller rot, but then it sounded like Fitz thought it was just a disconnect. I still find it very strange that he did not make Miller discuss other sources. Unless he felt no crimes were committed and needed her to verify Libby's story.
39 posted on
10/05/2005 8:14:25 PM PDT by
frankjr
To: frankjr
That's my guess. He has nothing to justify to continue to GJ. Remember, his office stated or hinted that "the preliminary" crime had not been committed and that he was looking to investigate periphery crimes.
I cannot see conspiracy because there is no underlining crime. Perjury is impossible to prove. My guess is that he will slap Rove and Libby on hand, lecture about good government and move on.
46 posted on
10/05/2005 8:19:50 PM PDT by
Perdogg
To: frankjr
Fitzgerald was the one who put Miller in jail - her claim was litigated all the way to the SCOTUS. then suddenly he becomes concerned that Libby was "letting her rot"? he could have declared her testiomony no longer relevant at any time if he wanted her to be freed.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson