Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former Bush official indicted in probe
Star-Telegram (AP) ^ | 10/5/2005 | MICHAEL J. SNIFFEN

Posted on 10/05/2005 6:14:24 PM PDT by wjersey

WASHINGTON - The Bush administration’s former chief procurement official was indicted Wednesday by a federal grand jury on charges of making false statements and obstructing investigations into high-powered Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

The five felony counts in the indictment charge David H. Safavian with obstructing Senate and executive branch investigations into whether he aided Abramoff in efforts to acquire property controlled by the General Services Administration around the nation’s capital.

Both probes looked into an August 2002 golf outing that Safavian took to Scotland with Abramoff, former Christian Coalition executive Ralph Reed, Rep. Bob Ney, R-Ohio, and others.

Safavian, a former lobbying associate of Abramoff, is the first person beyond Abramoff himself to face charges arising out of the probe of the lobbyist, who is a major Republican fundraiser with close ties to GOP leaders in Congress.

The indictment covers May 16, 2002, until January 2004, when Safavian was chief of staff at the General Services Administration, the government housekeeping agency. From November 2004 until late last month when he resigned three days before his arrest, he was the government’s top procurement officer in the Office of Management and Budget.

The indictment said Safavian falsely told a GSA ethics officer, a GSA inspector general’s agent and the Senate Indian Affairs Committee that Abramoff had no business with GSA at the time the Scotland trip was being planned. It said Safavian concealed that Abramoff did have business with GSA before the trip and that Safavian was aiding him in dealing with GSA.

Barbara Van Gelder, Safavian’s lawyer, has said that Safavian accurately reported Abramoff was not doing business with GSA at the time of the trip, and she said Safavian would fight the charges.

Each count carries a potential top penalty of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: probe; safavian
The DUmmys say more are coming - that over a dozen indictments may be coming in the Plame case this month.
1 posted on 10/05/2005 6:14:25 PM PDT by wjersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wjersey

"The DUmmys say more are coming - that over a dozen indictments may be coming in the Plame case this month."


I'll believe that when I see it. Any more than two people indicted would stun me and I am guessing no indictments.

The current administration may be the cleanest two term Presidency in a long time so any problems need to be taken in that context.


2 posted on 10/05/2005 6:26:04 PM PDT by gondramB (Conservatism is a positive doctrine. Reactionaryism is a negative doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wjersey
A DOZEN PEOPLE "outed" the non-covert, non-operative Plame??? ROTFLMAO!!!

What the hell are they smoking over there anyway? Shouldn't only the first one count? Once the first person "outed" the non-covert, non-operative, the other 11 don't count.

3 posted on 10/05/2005 8:02:49 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (We Gave Peace A Chance. It Didn't Work Out. Search keyword: 09-11-01.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wjersey

The only thing Ive read about the Plame case is that you dont have to get to the end to indict ...If something was there indictments would have already happened


Politically this aint Whitewater


4 posted on 10/05/2005 8:08:21 PM PDT by woofie (Trying hard to become another Buckhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woofie

I suspect the Dems are planning a picnic of Ham Sandwich indictments. Easy to get and will keep the GOP and Conservatives on the defensive. Win at any cost is the Democrat motto.


5 posted on 10/05/2005 8:12:39 PM PDT by stocksthatgoup (Polls = Proof that when the MSM want yo"ur opinion they will give it to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson