To: cripplecreek
"Newdow believes that it is time to get rid of the old Pledge of Allegiance altogether. He said that it's impractical to just change the pledge because children will continue to say "under God" out of habit or under protest."
I thought there was a small chance this guy was sincere about separation of church and state. This comment reveals that he is against free expression of religion. Hopefully this will end his 15 minutes.
4 posted on
10/05/2005 4:58:26 PM PDT by
gondramB
(Conservatism is a positive doctrine. Reactionaryism is a negative doctrine.)
To: gondramB
under protestSo now it's unconstitutional for other children to say it if they chooooose to?
7 posted on
10/05/2005 5:00:16 PM PDT by
No Longer Free State
(No event has just one cause, no person has just one motive, no action has just the intended effect.)
To: gondramB
One good thing about Newdow is the fact that he's too arrogant or stupid to keep his true agenda to himself.
13 posted on
10/05/2005 5:07:44 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
To: gondramB
Newdow believes that it is time to get rid of the old Pledge of Allegiance altogether. He said that it's impractical to just change the pledge because children will continue to say "under God" out of habit or under protest."Bingo. Loud and obnoxious, till the day I die.
21 posted on
10/05/2005 5:15:19 PM PDT by
RedBeaconNY
(Vous parlez trop, mais vous ne dites rien.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson