Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
She wrote that back in 1992. Long ago. In response to gun grabbers wanting to exploit a shooting to enact gun control. And she wrote a gutsy response to them.

It was hardly "gutsy". She mentioned the RKBA only very quickly among a bunch of other rights listed in the Constitution. It was not by any stretch of the imagination the focus of her comments. Instead, her solution centered around a bunch of it-takes-a-village, Hillary Clinton style nonsense about dealing with what she considered the "root causes" of crime, none of which had anything to do with the lack of availability of guns in the right hands. There was nothing indicating that she was even making a specific response to the gun grabbers at all.

881 posted on 10/05/2005 8:12:28 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 852 | View Replies ]


To: inquest
It was hardly "gutsy". She mentioned the RKBA only very quickly among a bunch of other rights listed in the Constitution

Yes, it was gutsy. She mentioned the Tower sniper. She didn't flinch from demanding that rights be maintained in the face of demands for greater safety.

That's gutsy.

894 posted on 10/05/2005 8:18:12 PM PDT by dirtboy (Drool overflowed my buffer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 881 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson