"She obviously is the most qualified in his eyes. The nomination is his perogative, not yours."
True enough. Picking Supreme Court nominees is one of the perquisites of the Office of the President. But that doesn't mean I can't disagree with the President's judgment. I think he picked a FOB aka Bush crony who is not the most qualified candidate in the whole USA as Bush says. You may believe that but I do not. I wanted him to give us conservative judges with a proven record. I'm sure Harriet is a nice lady, smart to be sure, but she is not what Bush led me to believe he would nominate. Roberts too is unproven.
I understand your position, but I trust Bush to give us a competent true conservative. I think the lack of prior visibility on her part is a shrewd political calculation to outmanuever the Dems. I don't think the Senate is strong enough to approve a Janice Rodgers Brown and BUsh knows it.
But, tagging her as nothing but a crony, demeans her and my President.
All nominees are unproven. He has such a history with her, i do not see how he could be mistaken on her true beliefs. And I don't care what anyone says, a judge's beliefs show themselves in their opinions.
No one can escape who they are.