[dirtboy]

So you don't like it when a Justice brings a personal bias. That's what I'm saying.

Boy, you can turn on a dime. You said you wanted Scalia. I pointed out his personal bias and how it affected a ruling he made.

And then YOU FRIGGIN' WENT AND PROJECTED THAT ONTO MIERS WITH ABSOLUTELY NO BASIS FOR DOING SUCH.

All the support for this women is that she brings the "right" bias.

Bias? She has said she will literally interpret the Constitution, you weasel.

You're worthless. You can't even stick to your own points as you thrash about desperately to defame Miers.

[Sabramerican]

I didn't turn. I showed why your criteria wasn't valid.

My model on the current court is Scalia. A heavyweight who may sometimes render decisions with which I would argue.

Not a lightweight who may vote the "right" way- as she sees- it by rote.

She has said she will literally interpret the Constitution, you weasel.

And where has she manifested any ability to interpret the Constitution?

Got more names to call me?