That's absurd. What we KNOW about her is that she is a hand-gun toting, evangelical Christian conservative who has taken adament stands against abortion whenever she was given the option.
We know she is a highly regarded lawyer with a specialty in Contract Law (and if we could somehow get the SC to recognize that the Constitution is a contract and treat it as such we will have won the constitutional debate).
People close to her say she is an originalist (similar to Bork's stance). That fits in with her Contract Law background.
We know she's put before the President every justice he's nominated (which we've liked so much).
Ann Coulter accused the President of trying hand us a Souter during the Roberts nomination. BACK THEN she wanted a sure Conservative Vote on the courts. Now it seems Roberts is the MODEL for ALL justices. I don't recall Ann apologizing or admitting she was wrong about Roberts.
Now what sort of dream candidate were YOU looking for? I can guarantee the President has already seen his/her record. He settled on THIS one. The choice is his...not yours not mine not Ann's. This wouldn't have been my choice but then I haven't seen all the documentation on MY choice either. The President has, he selected THIS one, and there is NOTHING unsuitable (that I've seen so far) about THIS one.
We WON. We got our way. I wish somehow that Conservatives would learn to be happy with victory and not see it as a plot against them.