[P-Marlowe]

And now let the personal attacks on ann coulter begin...

As well they should.

Ann turns out to be an elitist Washington insider.

Frankly I am tickled pink that Bush nominated someone with Miers qualifications (or lack of them thereof). Personally I would have preferred that Bush nominate someone who did not even go to Law School, much less one who went to an Ivy League Law school. But if he had to appoint someone who graduated from Law School, SMU is better than most, but I think a former Janitor or Fast Food manager who graduated from a non-accredited Evenings only Law School would have been a better pick.

Miers has all the qualifications she needs. She's an American, she is more intelligent than me, and she teaches Sunday School at an Independent Fundamentalist/Evangelical Come-to-Jesus Altar-Calling Church.

Hallelujah.

[flashbunny]

No,they shouldn't.

It just reveals the hypocrisy.

People lap it up when Ann attacks a liberal.

When she dares attack bush's actions on a pick, suddenly Ann coulter is a persona non grata.

Doesn't matter if it's justified. The same tactics they praised will be condemned, and the personal attacks will fly for the same tactics they embraced.

The most dangerous thing is fail to allow dissent when it is deserved. We don't need a nation of sycophants who only praise a president's actions because of what party he belongs to, anymore than we need a nation who condemns him based on the same criteria.