[flashbunny]

"Bush promised us a strict constructionist, and you have yet to find out if she would be a Scalia or a Thomas"

THAT is exactly the problem.

And that is what some people still don't get.

We had dozens of people who we knew what they believed based on their public record. Instead of asking why those people weren't nominated, all I've been seeing is excuses (oh, the RINOs in the senate would betray us) and attacks (GO BACK TO DU! I TRUST THE PRESIDENT YOU TROLL!)

[goldstategop]

I've nothing against Miers' personally but her lack of a demonstrated record means no one can judge her qualifications to be a Supreme Court justice objectively. I don't just want to take the President's word for it - and that's why the Senate should reject this nomination.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)