I don't get it.
The Bush Administration makes excuses for, and runs cover for, Clinton, Reno, Hillary, Tenet and others.
The Bush Administration accepts blame for actions they had no responsibility for, like Katrina, that empowers the RATs.
The Bush Administration spends MORE on social welfare than RATs.
Bush fails to nominate two known and highly qualified Constructionists/Originalists/Constitutionalists to SCOTUS--even though he promised to.
I really don't get it. Why is President Bush seem more intent on running cover for the Clinton Administration than he is in running the nation like a Republican president who won the White House, the Senate and the House?
Why do Republicans get on their knees for RATs when the RATs LOST THE ELECTIONS!!!!!!!!
Why do we work so hard, take time off work to campaign for George Bush, bust our butts to help reverse the Marxist juggernaut, get Bush and Republicans elected, then after victory, have Bush and the Republican act like they got swamped in the last election?????????????
Has Katie Couric gotten to George Bush and the Republican "leadership"? Has the New York Times reduced the spine in Republicans to mush?
Why is Bush snatching defeat from the jaws of victory????????
Very good and depressing questions. Like you and a number of other posters on this thread, I'm getting pretty fed up with the failure of most Reps to be true to the ostensible Rep philosophies. I can tell you that, for me, W is a major disappointment on many levels and his action in awarding the Medal of Freedom to the nincompoop Tenet is an icon for this disappointment.