Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TomGuy
Allen said all his calls received were negatives on Miers. He said he hadn't decided but his callers are opposed to her.

And he should totally disregard those calls because not one single one of those people have heard a single answer to a single question yet. The pronouncements of people who jump to conclusions should not be considered in a matter this important.

What has happened to America where a person is limited according to the school they attended. What ever happened to the country that judges people according to their merits? We don't know her merits yet.

37 posted on 10/05/2005 1:15:29 PM PDT by McGavin999 (We're a First World Country with a Third World Press (Except for Hume & Garrett ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: McGavin999

But, jeez Louise, shouldn't a nominee to the Supreme Court at least have merits?


44 posted on 10/05/2005 1:19:10 PM PDT by RedRover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: McGavin999
And he should totally disregard those calls because not one single one of those people have heard a single answer to a single question yet.

You don't need to. It is a principled position to be against a blank slate who never would have been considered if not for being a suck-up to the President. I have already called my Senators and told them to vote no.

129 posted on 10/05/2005 1:58:26 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson