Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: traderrob6
Considering his past record on judicial nominess I am willing to give W the benefit of the doubt untill evidence exists to the contrary. Should that happen I'll jump on the bash Bush bandwagon but not sooner.

Well, the problem is that we might not know for a number of years.

159 posted on 10/05/2005 2:15:24 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]


To: Rodney King

"Well, the problem is that we might not know for a number of years."

Doubt it, you may know a lot more in a few weeks. My guess is with the soon to be expidited number of cases facing SCOTUS and she's confirmed you'll know for sure in a year.


168 posted on 10/05/2005 2:21:32 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]

To: Rodney King
Well, the problem is that we might not know [if Miers was as good a judicial choice as Bush's other nominations] for a number of years.

Well that's true of all SC nominees. As Coulter loves to point out, Souter had better credentials as conservative justice than John Roberts.

Now that I think of it, she was the one who was complaining that Roberts was a sure-fire conservative vote on the court. Now Bush has picked a gun-toting, anti-abortion, evangelical Christian who put all the justices Coulter liked in front of Bush, and she's mad because Southern Methodist University (on of the top Texas schools) isn't a North Eastern blue-blood obediance training schools.

Conservatives just cannot mentally and emotionally accept it when they win. They always think it's a trick.

176 posted on 10/05/2005 2:25:03 PM PDT by Crush T Velour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson