To: for-q-clinton
The cost is
de minimus, unless the vaunted Microsoft coding stable is not what it has been billed to be.
You keep trying to move the focus away from the central fact: Microsoft is excluding itself from Massachusetts by refusing to implement ODF, while at the same time demanding the luxury of victimhood status. That's rich.
201 posted on
10/07/2005 8:24:52 AM PDT by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
To: Petronski
Do you also believe a tax increase on corporations doesn't impact consumers? If not, why not?
I'm just trying to find out the nature of your issue. By answering this question I can discern if I'm wasting my time or not.
203 posted on
10/07/2005 8:29:39 AM PDT by
for-q-clinton
(If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
To: Petronski
The cost is de minimus, unless the vaunted Microsoft coding stable is not what it has been billed to be.
Based on what data?!? HTF do you know what the software development costs are for ODF?
258 posted on
10/07/2005 10:10:51 AM PDT by
Bush2000
(Linux -- You Get What You Pay For ... (tm)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson