To: shuckmaster; connectthedots
"How many times have you asked that question and completely ignored the answers you were given? It seems he is still having trouble connecting the dots.
The artiodactyl to cetacean sequence looks pretty complete to me. To show evidence of, therefore the existence of, transition between organisms, we only need one sequence. All else is just gravy.
86 posted on
10/05/2005 9:48:36 AM PDT by
b_sharp
(Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
To: b_sharp
To show evidence of, therefore the existence of, transition between organisms, we only need one sequence. All else is just gravy. But, how can you prove a forest exists if one of the trees is unaccounted for?
90 posted on
10/05/2005 9:52:06 AM PDT by
shuckmaster
(Bring back SeaLion and ModernMan!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson