[ATOMIC_PUNK]

"My personal conviction is not consistent with (the) homosexual lifestyle
OK She isn't a Homosexual nor dose she want to be !

...(or)...to decriminalize (homosexual) behavior."
I didn't realize BEING a Homosexual was against the law i mean i do in some states but not Constitutional Law anyway .

[Do not dub me shapka broham]

It's not.

Illustrative-yet again-of why this woman should be rejected.

She can not even craft a coherent sentence explaining her beliefs, why should we believe that she has a coherent judicial philosophy?