Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: T.Smith
Bush's nominees need to be constitutional scholars and constructionists first and foremost.

Oh, please. Clarence Thomas is far from a "constitutional scholar," yet he is held up as an ideal around here.

Let's remember that Thomas was an unknown in 1991, and that he was also labelled a "second tier" choice by even some conservatives.

62 posted on 10/04/2005 7:53:59 PM PDT by sinkspur (Breed every trace of the American Staffordshire Terrier out of existence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur

Constitutional scholars are typically liberal.


65 posted on 10/04/2005 7:55:26 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
"Let's remember that Thomas was an unknown in 1991, and that he was also labelled a "second tier" choice by even some conservatives."

Full disclosure - I finished high school in 1991. The only contemporary memory I have of Thomas involves pubic hair and a Coke can.

79 posted on 10/04/2005 8:00:32 PM PDT by T.Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur

Thomas was a DC Circuit Court judge before he was nominated.


82 posted on 10/04/2005 8:01:11 PM PDT by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson