I only am aware of the the several controversial ones. I have no knowledge of the hundreds of others that sailed through the confirmation process. I suspect that neither do you. How can you say that "Bush has not disappointed in ANY of his Federal judicial appointments," when you have no knowledge of who they are and what rulings they have made?
Figures. You're willing to wait on these hundreds of Federal court appointees, but you won't give Bush the benefit of the doubt on two Supreme Court picks.
I was taking issue with your blanket endorsement of all of Bush's judicial picks, most of whom you know nothing about. GWB also appointed Brown to be in charge of FEMA and Chertoff for HMS. I consider them to be bad appointments and smack more of cronyism than anything else. Miers is another one.
You consider Brown to be bad because the media forced you into thinking he was bad.
Did you know he managed 150 separate disasters for FEMA in his term, including four simultaneous hurricane relief efforts? They all looked like the prelude and postlude to Rita in Texas. IOW, smooth and seamless.
Louisiana is a separate breed when it comes to incompetence. Brown ran smack dab into the Nagin-Blanco maelstrom, and was ground up in it, courtesy of Shep Smith and Anderson Cooper.
Michael Brown was a scapegoat for Louisiana decadence.