Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
You are truly a block head. He asked you for a description on her judicial philosophy, you told us how you think she would rule on a particular issue.

And if you say that she is an "originalist" or a "constructionist" you better accompany that with a definition because I doubt that you understand that there's a difference between the two.

324 posted on 10/04/2005 9:22:49 PM PDT by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]


To: Don'tMessWithTexas

Why don't you tell us her judicial philosophy?


328 posted on 10/04/2005 9:24:01 PM PDT by MJY1288 (Whenever a Liberal is Speaking on the Senate Floor, Al-Jazeera Breaks in and Covers it LIVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies ]

To: Don'tMessWithTexas

"He asked you for a description on her judicial philosophy, you told us how you think she would rule on a particular issue."

Her position on the 2nd Amendment is 100% originalist, something that Luttig and Brown have not seen fit to indicate.

If that's her view on that extremely contentious aspect of jurisprudence, then she's probably more "originalist" than you are, dumbs***.


332 posted on 10/04/2005 9:25:25 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies ]

To: Don'tMessWithTexas
"originalist" or a "constructionist"

If I remember correctly Scalia explains it at the below link. At about 45 minutes into the video he also tells who he believes we ought to pick if we want a conservative court. rtsp://video.c-span.org/project/c04/c04031405_scalia.rm

396 posted on 10/04/2005 9:42:10 PM PDT by Snoopers-868th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson