I was really disappointed in Ann, when she started sounding like a whiney Dem....
when she used the "cronyism" word .... just like Pat Buchanan did yesterday.
THAT word, along with "corrupt" are the two "talking points-word of the week", given to all dems and media...and NOW we have two of the most "conservative" authors accusing Bush of this also...
HMMMMMMMMMM
Oh, dear, hearing Tony Snow now saying that Laura Bush is a factor...hope they don't start throwing Laura Bush under the bus...sigh.
I think it's an apt description. I guess it sucks for us that GWB has screwed up so badly that Ann Coulter is in accord with Democrat talking points, but I certainly don't think she's TRYING to be a spouter of talking points. I think she's being honest. Ann's saying this person is totally out of her league and the only explanation is cronyism, which is just a fancy way of saying he hired his own lawyer instead of the actual job applicants, which is true. I think the hearings will be fascinating. I really think the point of attack should be her actual job knowledge. ESPECIALLY on the heels of Roberts' performance. Again, I agree with Ann. I didn't appreciate the stealth factor with Roberts. But I certainly had to give him credit--enormous credit--for his qualifications, as displayed by him in the hearings. I can't wait to see what she sounds like under intense questioning ABOUT CON. LAW.