"I didn't see Jay Sekulo, James Dobson, Chuck Colson, American Center for Law & Justice, and Orin Hatch endorse John Kerry; did you?"
And I don't see religious affiliation being more important the constitutional philosphy when it comes to a lifetime appointment on the supreme court.
Which matters more: What a religious leader says about the religous nature of a candidate, or how that candidate will rule when it comes to the constitution?
Are you actually suggesting that the viewpoint of a major- conservative-legal institution (ACLJ) that fights liberalism everyday in the courts means nothing? I think you've crossed over the bridge of cynicism.