Posted on 10/04/2005 2:46:19 PM PDT by defconw
LISTEN TO MARK LEVIN ONLINE AND JOIN THE DISCUSSION
6-8PM Eastern
Will we hear
GET OFF THE PHONE YOU MORON, or
GET OFF THE PHONE YOU BIG JERK, or
GET OFF THE PHONE YOU DOPE
And a damn fine book it is.
You're NO KIND of idiot! You are always a reasonable person who supports Bush, conservatives and the Republican Party. NOTHING wrong with that. I just hope you won't get down because this ONE issue is dividing people. We'll regroup! Heck, our hatred of Hillary will do that! Even Mark said he didn't consider you an idiot, and he appreciates your support. Just let him have his time to be ticked! He deserves that! He's not going to vote for Hillary (I think we can count on that!!) A few DUers and wimpy conservatives can't turn the tide!
25 cents for the cuss jar!
He gave himself away when he said he supported eminent domain.
No No you got him you keep him!
This form of vetting is A Way to do the vetting, if one feels the need due to a weak senate.
EXACTLY! We will survive!
Can anyone access the link in red on Drudge about the importance of NOT confirming Miers?
Why was that kind of experience thrown out the window with this choice?
Eek!
The right to property is in the body of the US Constitution 5 times.
James Madison had said that anyone who takes your property does not respect your ideas. He was very perceptive.
If I had that answer, I'd have my own radio show! ;-)
A little anal, no? He was sworn in 1988, and Casey came down in 1992 -- ok, 4 years. With all due respect, your argument is illogical. For instance, Scalia was also interviewed, and he turned out to be very solid. You are joining a small chorus defending emotion over logic. That's ok, but that's what it is. My book has example after example of cronies picked by presidents who were terrible.
If the GOP would stop aiding DUmocrat-supporting RINOs and rid the country of the vote fraud, the LIEberals wouldn't be able to get elected to dog catcher! The power-mongers like Kerry and Kennedy are why I support Senate term limits.
And someone else would be doing the laundry :-)
yup! LMAO!
Hardly, I'm arguing that the vetting process is more reliable when the POTUS has personal knowledge of the nominee. I think it's difficult for anybody to argue against that.
A personality change of major scope can occur to anyone no matter how finely vetted. Medical events such as strokes, major surgeries, have at times resulted in such changes. Why bang up on Bush for what happened with Judge Kennedy? It was not simething you and the other selectors and vetters can predict with confidence. President Bush used HIS own sense -- which is highly developed, as circumstances show -- to pick a candidate, THE candidate with whom HE has the most assurance will keep to the strict constructionist philosophy he promised.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.