Replies

This is going to be VERY interesting. I am dying for my party to show some balls. Pelosi has the guts to stand up there and say that this is more of the culture of corruption, when she herself had rushed to file travel statements on a trip she "forgot" about, AFTER having accused Delay of failing to report or taking lobbyist paid trips.

I want to see a fight. Just like, I wanted Bush to pick someone that we could once and for all fight the Demoncats on and win and shove it up their arses.

JW777 WROTE: "This is going to be VERY interesting. I am dying for my party to show some balls. Pelosi has the guts to stand up there and say that this is more of the culture of corruption, when she herself had rushed to file travel statements on a trip she "forgot" about, AFTER having accused Delay of failing to report or taking lobbyist paid trips."

JW777 ADDED: "I want to see a fight. Just like, I wanted Bush to pick someone that we could once and for all fight the Demoncats on and win and shove it up their arses."

After learning more about Miers and hearing Rove talk about the Hariett Miers nomination, my analysis is that Bush is employing a calculated "strategery" and is being greatly "misunderestimated" by the RATS, the Media and many Conservatives.

With loyalty being as important to Bush as it is, and with his having seen the disasters of nominating SCOTUS Justices Souter, Kennedy and O'Connor, I cannot believe that Bush would nominate someone who is not faithful to the concept of original intent of the Constitution---and be staunchly pro-life.

That being said, I believe that Bush's plan was to put up two seemingly "stealth" candidates, who are KNOWN by him to be conservative: pro-life and strict constructionists. The RATS would be caught off-guard---and RELIEVED---by his NOT nominating two CLEAR, STAUNCH conservatives.

As a result of Bush's SCOTUS track record, aging SCOTUS Justice Stevens, would feel less worried about Bush nominating an ultra-conservative and feel safe to retire early.

Then, for the "third time's a charm" nomination, Bush takes the "nucular" option and nominates Janice Rogers Brown.

Because of his SCOTUS track record, the RATS would have a harder time arguing that Bush nominates ultra-conservatives, and assuming she is then confirmed, we would have THREE NEW CONSERVATIVE SCOTUS JUSTICES and Roe could be overturned on the grounds of FRAUD in the original case and NEW MEDICAL INFORMATION which was not known at the time Roe was first decided.

Mark my words...You heard it here first...I believe Miers is part of Bush's "strategery" to add THREE conservative Justices to the SCOTUS!