To: BigSkyFreeper
She wasn't referring to her as a "Jesus-freak."
She was ridiculing the pathetic rationale that her supporters have been offering in her defense.
Namely, that she is a good nominee because she is a good Christian.
Her point was that there are millions of good, Pentecostal Christians who would have been preferable to Ms. Miers.
To: Do not dub me shapka broham
Her point was that there are millions of good, Pentecostal Christians who would have been preferable to Ms. Miers.That sounds odd. Why would these millions of good Christians have been preferable to Ms. Miers?
To: Do not dub me shapka broham
The nominee is not a Pentecostal. She is an Evangelical. World of difference.
697 posted on
10/04/2005 3:30:35 PM PDT by
Coldwater Creek
("Over there, Over there, we will be there until it is Over there.")
To: Do not dub me shapka broham
Her point was that there are millions of good, Pentecostal Christians who would have been preferable to Ms. Miers.The argument is still vacuous.
747 posted on
10/04/2005 4:35:59 PM PDT by
BigSkyFreeper
("Don't Get Stuck On Stupid!" - Lieutenant General Russell "Ragin' Cajun" Honore)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson