Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BigSkyFreeper
She wasn't referring to her as a "Jesus-freak."

She was ridiculing the pathetic rationale that her supporters have been offering in her defense.

Namely, that she is a good nominee because she is a good Christian.

Her point was that there are millions of good, Pentecostal Christians who would have been preferable to Ms. Miers.

659 posted on 10/04/2005 3:05:09 PM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("I'm okay with being unimpressive. It helps me sleep better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies ]


To: Do not dub me shapka broham
Her point was that there are millions of good, Pentecostal Christians who would have been preferable to Ms. Miers.

That sounds odd. Why would these millions of good Christians have been preferable to Ms. Miers?

673 posted on 10/04/2005 3:14:33 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 659 | View Replies ]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham
The nominee is not a Pentecostal. She is an Evangelical. World of difference.
697 posted on 10/04/2005 3:30:35 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, Over there, we will be there until it is Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 659 | View Replies ]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham
Her point was that there are millions of good, Pentecostal Christians who would have been preferable to Ms. Miers.

The argument is still vacuous.

747 posted on 10/04/2005 4:35:59 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper ("Don't Get Stuck On Stupid!" - Lieutenant General Russell "Ragin' Cajun" Honore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 659 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson